What next for Referendum 71?

Approve Referendum 71

Approve Referendum 71

The Secretary of State’s office announced on Tuesday through their blog that they will conduct a complete verification of the entire petition rather than a 3 % sampling.  While I think it is fantastic that every single signature will be scrutinized, it could be several weeks before we know the results.

It does not hurt to start thinking about the future.  What if Referendum 71 does qualify for the ballot?  What next? We need to switch our thinking from decline to sign to Approve Referendum 71, Preserve the Domestic Partnership Law. That’s right, Approve.  This is how the referendum will look if it makes the ballot in November:

REFERENDUM 71

Ballot Title
Statement of Subject: The legislature passed Engrossed Second Substitute Senate Bill 5688 concerning rights and responsibilities of state-registered domestic partners [and voters have filed a sufficient referendum petition on this bill].

Concise Description: This bill would expand the rights, responsibilities, and obligations accorded state-registered same-sex and senior domestic partners to be equivalent to those of married spouses, except that a domestic partnership is not a marriage.

Should this bill be:

Approved ___
Rejected ___

Unfortunately misinformation is already creeping into the media, blogs, social networks, and voters’ minds. As an exercise in prudence and for the protection of our families and friends, let’s start talking about referendum 71 as if it was going to qualify for the ballot.  Please start the conversation now because if we wait, it could be too late.  In a post prop 8 world, supporters of equality are very used to saying “no”.  I certainly understand the impulse to say no to the discrimination Larry Stickney and Gary Randall embody, but be clear when you are thinking about Referendum 71.  It is not prop 8.  It is different. Read it carefully and do not be tricked, because if we have learned anything by the petition gathering period we know that Randall and Stickney are more than willing to lie to get their way.  If nothing else remember, approve equality, approve our rights, approve our families, approve our future, approve of the legislatures decision to give us equal rights, approve of the law the legislature passed in 2009, approve domestic partnerships, approve referendum 71.

One more time, say it with me now and say it loud, “I approve referendum 71 to preserve domestic partnerships!“  Great job!  Now go say it to at least 10 people you know.

Please Share:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Current
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • SphereIt
  • Turn this article into a PDF!
  • Live
Sphere: Related Content

  • William Scarvie
    They had me fooled. I could very easily fallen for this deception. I approve referendum 71 to preserve domestic partnerships.
  • JWaymack
    This is Orwellian insanity. Those who supported the rights and responsibilities of state-registered domestic partners and have been asking GLBT folk and their allies to oppose Referendum 71 for numerous months. Now we've got to ask those same people to vote for Referendum 71? This is something Karl Rove would truly be proud of.

    Let's all hope that Referendum 71 fails to qualify after all signatures are reviewed. In the mean time, I'm not sure if starting a new movement to approve Referendum 71 at this time is a good idea. I believe the time to start a new campaign will be after the final ruling to qualify Referendum for ballot has been made by those responsible for that task (if Referendum 71 qualifies). Otherwise, remarks and promotion by those who support rights and responsibilities of state-registered domestic partners can be taken out of context as looking wishy-washy, flip flop, etc. by the current batch of Rovian spinners.

    One step at a time, please.
  • I respectfully disagree. Misinformation is already creeping into the consciousness of Washington voters. If we allow three or four weeks to go by before educating the public then not only have we lost valuable campaign time, but we have created a more difficult situation than we already have. It is far easier to teach people the right information in the first place than it is to retrain them once they have been miss informed. We should treat this like a real campaign until the information changes otherwise. We have nothing to gain by waiting and everything to lose.
  • Robert Herrmann
    Call me stupid, but I am COMPLETELY confused by this turn-about!, How, after all these months of disseminating "Decline to Sign" information, is it suddenly alright to APPROVE Ref.71. Please explain as if I'm a fourth grader (despite my college education). I'm really mystified here.
  • You are not stupid at all. This is a very confusing issue. The decline to sign effort was to prevent referendum 71 from making the ballot. Full fledged ballot campaigns are very expensive and we know that our community is struggling just like the rest of Washington so we wanted to prevent spending millions of dollars to protect our families. Furthermore, since they turned in a significant quantity of signatures the domestic partnership expansion bill is on hold until all of the signatures are counted, and if it qualifies, until after the November election. During this time period families are not getting the protection they need. We wanted to speed up the implementation of the domestic partnership expansion bill by preventing a vote on the issue.

    Now the very real possibility exists that our opponents collected enough signatures to qualify for the ballot. They used terribly deceptive tactics to do this, including telling would be signers they were supporting equal rights. (It is legal for them to lie about petitions). Referendums are a Washington state constitutional process that gives an addition check to the people in the checks and balance systems. Like the governor can veto a bill the people can approve or reject legislation with enough support through the petition process. In our case, the bill in question is the domestic partnership expansion bill of 2009. We are being asked to approve or reject this bill. If you support fairness (and I hope you do) you will have to vote to approve the domestic partnership expansion bill of 2009 and to do that you must vote to approve referendum 71. Please let me know if you have more questions.
  • Henry you can link back to this blog if you want. I have it hosted on my server. http://blog.joemirabella.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/approve-71-logo.jpg
  • Henry Waymack
    Awesome! Thanks!
  • Henry Waymack
    Where can I link to the "Approve Ref. 71" logo short of right-clicking and saving to file?
  • No Tom, I am not kidding. We will vote to approve referendum 71 to protect domestic partnerships if it makes the ballot.
  • TomLang
    You have GOT to be kidding me...
blog comments powered by Disqus