Fraud and intimidation from referendum 71 petition gatherers?

It appears opponents to domestic partnerships are hiring petition gatherers with long histories of alleged fraud to achieve their 120,557 goal to quality referendum 71 for the ballot. The Lewis County Chronicle reported on an incident in front of a Wal-Mart in which a paid signature gatherer intimidated voters. His name tag said he was Dan Ricca. The petition gatherer neither confirmed nor denied his identity, but for there to be two Dan Ricca’s with long histories of intimidating citizens to collect signatures is just too coincidental not to be true.

Here is a photo of the suspect:

Is this Dan Ricca

Is this Dan Ricca?

In October 2006 a Daniel Alwin Ricca was charged in Orange County, California for falsifying voter registration cards.  He allegedly told people they were signing a petition to cure breast cancer and fight child molestation.  Instead the victims were flipped from their previous political party to Republican. He was allegedly paid $10.00 per flip. At the time the warrant was issued Daniel Alwin Rica was 33. He plead not guilty in November of 2007. A jury acquitted Ricca of the charges in March of 2009.

In 2002 Dan Ricca was accused of forging signatures  by former co-workers in Oregon. During a December 2001 Video Taped deposition of Saul Klein, he claimed he saw Ricca forge signatures and alleged Ricca even hired people to forge signatures for him.  The testimony was part of a civil lawsuit brought by OEA and AFT-Oregon against various companies owned or operated by Bill Sizemore. OEA and AFT-Oregon alleged fraud and racketeering  by the various businesses, including forgery of signatures on various initiative petitions. During the trial Leesa Beaudoin, a former employee of Oregon Taxpayer United who worked for a short time on initiative petitions testified that Dan Ricca’s petitions were associated with “round table”, a practice of several petition gatherers sitting around a table and forging signatures.  In fact during the hearing 376 petitions were presented that were identified as forgeries that were gathered by Dan Ricca. “The jury awarded damages to OEA/AFT-Oregon for a total of $842,000. Because the racketeering charges were proven, under statutes the damages were tripled to just over $2.52 million.”

People are innocent until proven guilty in this country, but there is certainly enough evidence  that Dan Ricca is a suspicious individual whose activities should be monitored extraordinarily closely.  If there is even a slight chance the Dan Ricca the Chronicle encountered is the same Dan Ricca accused of fraud and forgery, I demand the Secretary of State validate every single signature turned in on Saturday. Standard operating procedure is a 3% review of signatures turned in.  Considering what’s at stake, nothing less than a 100% review of the signatures will satisfy me. And if you are on the fence about signing the petition, you should ask yourself, “do I want to give my personal information to someone like Dan Ricca?”   If you agree please contact the Washington Secretary of State’s office to let them know your feelings:

Nick Handy, Director of Elections

Location:
520 Union Avenue SE
Olympia, WA

Mail:
PO BOX 40229
OLYMPIA WA 98504-0229

Telephone: Toll-Free
(800) 448-4881
(800) 422-8683 TDD/TTY
(360) 902-4180

Please Share:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Current
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • SphereIt
  • Turn this article into a PDF!
  • Live
Sphere: Related Content

  • Thank you Cheryl. The Secretary of State's office is an ally through and through. I am confident they will do their best to make sure the process is legal and fair.
  • RE: possible signature fraud on Ref. 71: I left a msg at the 800# two nights ago, and this morning I received a pleasant and informative phone call from Teresa Glidden, 360-725-5780. (I forget her title, but Google says she's the Initiatives Supervisor, Elections Division, WA Secretary of State.) She welcomes inquiries, but says her office does not control who is hired to collect signatures nor do they review specific signatures upon request. Instead, with two representatives from the official opposition (in this case Washington Families Standing Together, a coalition that includes Decline to Sign 71) watching, her office reviews the signatures as a whole and historically has caught a high percentage of out and out fraud. She did take down this URL, but she advised relaying the concerns on this page to Josh Fredus at WA Families Standing Together. http://washingtonfamiliesstandingtogether.com/ ...Hope this helps!
blog comments powered by Disqus